My Navy career involved nuclear weapons. I served on nuclear weaponcapable submarines, including command at sea. I trained crews for nuclear weapon command and control, supervised nuclear war-, policy and treaty formulation in the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
tiffany heart toggle braceletWe can't get the nuclear genie back in the bottle, but we can reduce risks.
German scientific breakthroughs in the 1930s revealed how enormous destructive forces could be released by nuclear fission or fusion. Physicists fleeing Germany reported the Nazi Uranverein (uranium ) bomb project, resulting in the U.S. Manhattan project aided by Britain to build nuclear weapons. The first and only nuclear weapons to be used in anger at Japan contributed to ending World War II, then fueled Cold War fears between the U.S. and Soviet Union. Over time other nations developed nuclear weapons.
The U.S. and Soviet nuclear stockpiles grew enormous by the 1960s. Thoughtful people, worried about intentional or accidental use or theft of nuclear weapons, began a range of technical, treaty-alliance and trust-building efforts to reduce risks.
Examples include stopping atmospheric testing, banning nuclear weapons from outer space, stockpile-launcher reduction, emergency communications like the hot line, improving accuracy of weapons so warhead size could be reduced and ultimately shifting to conventional explosives, and more. Military folk who know the dangers of a nuclear environment supported these trends. Conventional weapons are bad enough.
Treaties between nuclear capable states are one of the best ways to reduce risks of hot warfare and nuclear attack. The process of treaty formulation, ratification, implementation and verification builds a culture of trust and respect between parties. Nuclear arms limitation talks began in the early 1960s. Agreements such as the Intermediate Nuclear Forces and the first Strategic Arms Reduction treaties helped end the Cold War without violence. Treaties constantly call attention to new risks,
as. Many treaties have expired.
In April 2010, Defense Secretary Robert Gates released the Nuclear Posture Review, a report that outlines the role of nuclear weapons in America's national security. The departments of Defense, State and Energy play key roles in the legislatively mandated process. Adm. Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said, "The chiefs and I fully support the findings of this nuclear posture review."
As part of this process, a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START II) can begin through the ratification process in the U.S. Senate as early as this week. I strongly recommend ratification. Here's why.
Start II will verifiably reduce surplus U.S. and Russian nuclear forces and ensure a stable and predictable U.S.-Russian nuclear relationship. Strategic missiles, bombers and deployed strategic warheads LED tube will be limited and verified. These provisions will allow the U.S. to count the actual number of warheads that Russian missiles carry, a first for an arms control treaty. START II gives high confidence that each side is complying with the treaty's limits and reduces the chances for misunderstanding or error that could lead to a nuclear exchange.
The U.S. will still be able to maintain a robust and flexible nuclear deterrent. Without START II, the U.S. would have far less confidence in its ability to limit and 深圳宝安搬家公司 monitor Russia's enormous nuclear arsenal.
S
Other articles:
http://www.cngreenwood.com/bbs/Blog.asp?BlogUserName=mywatche&menu=ShowBlog&BlogID=279
http://mywatches.sosblog.com/The-first-blog-b1/Joie-De-Vivier-b1-p11.htm
...
